Well, I have to admit, I’ve had a love-hate relationship with Gradle. Mostly hate, if I’m being honest. But last Tuesday, I decided to bump our main monolith’s wrapper to the newly released Gradle 9.2. I figured, “Hey, it’s February 2026, maybe build tools don’t have to be painful anymore.”
Spoiler: It broke everything. Immediately.
But once I fixed the carnage, something weird happened. My configuration time—the time I spend staring at a spinning wheel before the actual compilation even starts—dropped from 14 seconds to under 800 milliseconds. I actually thought the build had failed silently. It hadn’t.
The “Isolated Projects” Hammer Finally Dropped
We’ve been hearing about Isolated Projects since the 8.x days. The Gradle team kept warning us. “Don’t access mutable state across projects,” they said. “It prevents parallel configuration,” they said.
Well, in 9.2, they aren’t asking nicely anymore. Isolated Projects is on by default, and it is strict. If your root build.gradle.kts tries to reach into :subproject-A to set a version number or inject a plugin via allprojects {}, the build just dies. No warnings. Just a hard stop.
I ran into this immediately with an old reporting plugin we wrote back in 2023. It was doing this classic anti-pattern:
// The old way (Now illegal in 9.2 defaults)
subprojects {
// Accessing the project instance directly breaks isolation
if (project.name.startsWith("service-")) {
apply(plugin = "com.legacy.reporter")
}
}The error message was surprisingly helpful, though. It pointed me exactly to line 42 and told me to use the new lifecycle APIs instead. I had to rewrite the logic using the Convention Plugins approach we should have adopted two years ago.
Was it annoying? Yes. But look at these numbers.
Real World Numbers: The Monolith Test
I tested this on our “Legacy Beast”—a Spring Boot 4.0 (snapshot) repo with 85 subprojects. I ran this on my M3 Max MacBook (Sonoma 15.2) because I wanted to see raw throughput.
Scenario: Changing a single line of code in a leaf module (the utils library) and running ./gradlew build.
- Gradle 8.12 (Previous setup): Configuration time: 12.4s. Total time: 48s.
- Gradle 9.2 (Isolated Projects): Configuration time: 0.7s. Total time: 22s.
That configuration time drop is absurd. Because the projects are isolated, Gradle 9.2 caches the configuration model for every subproject independently.
Declarative Gradle is No Longer “Experimental”
Another thing that caught me off guard: the IDE support for Declarative Gradle (.dcl files) is finally good. I remember trying this back when it was announced around late 2024, and it felt like a toy. But now? It’s actually cleaner than Kotlin DSL.
Here’s what the build file looks like now:
// build.gradle.dcl
javaApplication {
mainClass = "com.example.App"
javaVersion = 25
dependencies {
implementation("org.springframework.boot:spring-boot-starter-web")
testImplementation("org.junit.jupiter:junit-jupiter")
}
}Notice what’s missing? The logic. You can’t write if (System.getenv("CI")) in there. It’s purely data. This constraints you, sure, but it also stops your junior dev from writing a network call inside the build script (yes, I’ve seen that happen).
The Java 25 Gotcha
We’re testing Java 25 (the latest LTS candidate) on a few services. Gradle 9.2 detects the toolchain correctly, which is nice. But I did hit a snag with the Daemon. If you’re running IntelliJ 2025.3, make sure you uncheck “Download sources automatically” in the Gradle settings if you’re on a metered connection.
Should You Upgrade?
Look, if you’re still on Gradle 7.x or early 8.x, you’re in for a world of pain. But for the first time in years, the performance gain actually matches the hype. My advice? Upgrade a small service first. Fix the isolation violations. Then tackle the monolith. Just don’t do it on a Friday afternoon.